2015 (8) TMI 256

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri S.K. Shukla, Authorised Representative Per : Mr. H.K. Thakur; This appeal has been filed by the appellant with respect to OIA No. OIA-AHM-SVTAX-000-APP-018-14-15 dated 22.04.2014 passed by passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Ahmedabad upholding OIO No. 41/STC-AHD /ADC (AS)/2012-13 dated 24.01.2013. 2. Shri S.J. Vyas, (Advocate) appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that his client ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alty payment. That it has been wrongly mentioned in Para 29 of the OIO dated 24.01.2013 that penalties of Rs. 1,93,555/- and Rs. 88,896/- pertain to the period prior to October 2006. Learned Advocate also made the Bench go through the chart made in the statements of fact, in appeal filed by the appellant to argue that no service tax or penalty was payable before October 2006. He also argued that S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is required to be paid under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. It is observed from the order dated 22.4.2014 passed by the first Appellate authority that he has not deliberated on the issue of reconciliation of payment particulars and the amounts paid by the appellant. For the purpose of reconciliation of the payments made vis-`-vis duty liability of the appellant, the matter is required to be....