2015 (8) TMI 106
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... : Shri Prabhat Kumar & Shri Bipin Garg, Advs. For the Respondent : Shri Govind Dixit, DR ST/Stay/60832/2013 in ST/60045/2013-CU(DB) ,ST/Stay/60859/2013 in ST/60052/2013, ST/Stay/61001/2013 in ST/60142/2013, ST/Stay/51543/2014 in ST/51310/2014, ST/Stay/61450/2013 in ST/60404/2013, ST/Stay/61488/2013 in ST/60429/2013, ST/Stay/61541/2013 in ST/60459/2013, ST/Stay/61633/2013 in ST/60511/2013 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rsal Engg. 10,40,911/- 8,18,273/- 2,22,638/- 5. ST/60404/2013 Scientecs Process Controls 37,72,416/- 35,18,673/- 2,53,743/- 6. ST/60429/2013 Electrotec Controls 18,53,767/- 17,39,603/- 1,14,614/- 7. ST/60459/2013 Kaveri Construction 6,54,039/- 4,17,854/- 2,36,185/- 8. ST/60511/2013 Heena Enterprises 4,18,517/- 2,12,690/-....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aking. 3. The Revenue strenuously argued that the appellants have not shown the exact amount of goods which were supplied which were eligible for the benefit of the said notification and that benefit can be given only if they provided documentary evidence to establish their eligibility for the benefit of the said notification. 4. We have considered the contentions of both sides. From the cha....
TaxTMI