Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (8) TMI 105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri K. Radia, Chartered Accountant For The Respondent : Shri Alok Srivastava, Authorised Representative Per : Mr. P.K. Das; The applicant filed this application for condonation of delay of 130 days in filing the appeal. 2. Learned Counsel on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant is a proprietorship firm and the proprietor was suffering from Eye problem from July 2014. He was advis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ehalf of the Revenue submits that the delay was occurred due to negligence of the employee of the applicant firm and this can not be a reason to condone the delay. He further submits that eye problem of the proprietor was even before receiving the impugned order. The main contention of the learned Authorised Representative is that the delay is only for the reason negligence of the applicant and th....