2015 (7) TMI 494

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....umar Desai, Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody, Advocate Per: Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral) 1. Whether the Adjudicating Officer ("AO" for short) of Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI" for shot) was justified in imposing penalty of Rs. 3 lacs for alleged violation of regulation 7(1A) read with regulation 7(2) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t make any difference to the investors. Secondly no loss is caused to any investor on account of non disclosure and hence, penalty imposed upon the appellant be set aside to the extent as this Tribunal deems it fit and proper. 3. We see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the AO. Under SAST Regulations, 1997 as also under SAST Regulations, 2011 disclosures are liable to be made with....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... consideration all mitigating factors has imposed penalty of only Rs. 3 lacs which cannot be said to be arbitrary or unreasonable. 4. Similarly, as per regulation 8(1) read with regulation 8(2) of SAST Regulations, 1997 appellant holding more than 15% shares of the target company was obliged to make yearly disclosure to the company within the period specified therein. Admittedly, during the per....