Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Excise Duty Liability on Scrap generated at Job Worker Premises

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcise Duty Liability on Scrap generated at Job Worker Premises<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Rakesh K Paliwal Dated:- 6-7-2015 Last Reply Date:- 7-7-2015 Central Excise<br>Got 3 Replies<br>Central Excise<br>Dear All, Pl let me know the judgments on above subject, when Principle Manufacture sent goods[ under rule 4(5)a] for fuhrer processing to job worker /processor , and get back after processi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng , which is add in final product on which duty paid by principle manufacturer, what is the treatment of scrap generated at job worker premises regarding duty liabilty ???? Regards Rakesh Paliwal Reply By Arun Kumar Singh: The Reply: The excise duty will paid on scrap also. Job worker should return the processed goods along with scrap to principal manufacturer. Reply By MUKUND THAKKAR: The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Reply: Dear Rakesh, in such situation you have two option. 1) you may cleared the scrap from your end by paying excise duty on realization value. 2) As suggested by Mr.Arun you may returned to your principal manufacturer along with processed goods. Reply By YAGAY AND SUN: The Reply: Dear Rakesh, Waste and Scrap not required to be returned - Waste and Scrap generated at job worker's end is n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot required to be returned to manufacturer. Only finished product is required to be returned- Forbes Aquatech v CCE (2008) 230 ELT 629 (CESTAT SMB)= 2008 (1) TMI 770 - CESTAT, BANGALORE - relying on CCE v Shahumbari Sugar (2004) 176 ELT 819 (CESTAT) = 2003 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI. In Windals Auto v CCE (2012) 279 ELT 298 (CESTAT SMB)= 2012 (11) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI, scrap was not br....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ought back but was directly sold from place of job worker on payment of excise duty. It was held that there is no loss and demand is not sustainable.No penalty can be imposed if waste and scrap is not returned or permission not obtained for clearance as rules do not require obtaining any permission - Bata India v CCE (2009) 238 ELT 316 (CESTAT SMB).= 2009 (1) TMI 575 - CESTAT, KOLKATA This is for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... your kind information. Regards, YAGAY and SUN (Management, Business & Indirect Tax Consultants)<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....