2014 (7) TMI 1194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MENT The two applications on which the impugned order has been  passed are one Rectification Application bearing No.16/2012 and another Reference Application No.118/2011. The operative part of the impugned  order dated 06.06.2012 reads as under:¬ (1) Rectification Application No.16 of 2012 is allowed. Thejudgment dated 22nd September 2011 in Second AppealNo.327 of 2011 is set aside....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ter noting the submissions including the objections to maintainability of the rectification application, so also, the  reference application the Tribunal straightaway proceeded to rectify the judgment dated 22.09.2011. Thus, the judgment delivered in Second Appeal No.327/2011 by the Tribunal was set aside and the Appeal was restored to the file of the Tribunal for a decision afresh and in acc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt case and which we  found not supportable in law. 5. For all these reasons we dismiss the Rectification Application   No.16/2012. The impugned order is quashed and set aside to this extent. However,the later direction of the   Tribunal   dismissing   the Reference  Application No.118/2011 is also set aside and that Reference Application &n....