2014 (11) TMI 983
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent. ORDER With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this Writ Petition the petitioner seeks for quashing the impugned notice dated 7-5-2008 issued by the respondent, by which the respondent has called upon the petitioner to submit their reply as to why the Cenvat credit availed by the petitioner ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Chennai, by stating that in the Order-in-Original the duty demanded was Rs. 7,32,445/- out of which the petitioner had already paid Rs. 6,73,452/- and therefore before the issuance of the show cause notice the balance amount of Rs. 58,994/- was paid. The petitioner requested for immunity from interest, penalty and prosecution under the Central Excise Act and IPC. 5. On 21-5-2007, before th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lowed the petitioner's case and passed final orders on 22-5-2007. 6. After about two years, when an inspection was conducted in the petitioner's premises, the authorities while going through the documents stated that the petitioner has availed Cenvat Credit with ineligible documents. Therefore a show cause notice was issued. This show cause notice is the subject matter of challenge in ....
TaxTMI