2011 (9) TMI 934

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties for final disposal of the petition. Petitioners have challenged an order dated 5-4-2011 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India. 2. Brief facts leading to the present petition are as follows : 3. The adjudicating authority had passed an order dated 29th March, 2004 confirming the certain duty and imposing penal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... presentation before the appropriate forum. 5. It is the case of the petitioners that thereafter, the Registry of the Tribunal did not handover the original papers of the appeal despite reminders from the petitioners. Eventually, petitioners presented their revision application before the Government of India on 18th December, 2009. Along with revision application, the petitioners also file....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the order of the appellate Commissioner dated 16th March, 2005, petitioners had shortly, thereafter, filed appeal before CESTAT. Such appeal was not only admitted, stay application of the petitioner was also allowed. It was only on 2nd February, 2009 that the CESTAT held that appeal was not maintainable. In that view of the matter, it can be stated that the petitioners were prosecuting the remed....