TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2011 (3) TMI 1571
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....espondent. ORDER Consequent to an offence case registered against M/s. Jay Bhagwati Textile Prints Pvt. Ltd., duty demand of ₹ 17,47,425/- with interest was confirmed on the ground that the appellant had removed processed fabrics without payment of duty. A penalty was also imposed on the second appellant namely Shri V.K. Chaudhary, the Director and penalty equal to duty demanded was also i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rder. 2. Revenue has filed this application in which Revenue is seeking recall of the above order and requesting to decide the same with the appeals filed by the Revenue which was pending during the relevant time. 3. The learned DR on behalf of the Revenue submitted that Revenue had also filed appeal Nos. E/1470-1471/09 against the impugned order-in-original dated 20-7-2009 wherein Rev....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 41 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, the Tribunal can make such orders or give such directions as may be necessary or expedient to give effect to its orders or to secure the hands of justice. He submits that in this case, to meet ends of justice, the order has to be recalled. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondents. However the learned advocate, Shri K.I. Vyas has submitted written submissions ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (3) CCE, Surat v. Chandrakant Dyeing & Printing Mills [2009 (237) E.L.T. 302 (Tri.-Ahmd.)] 5. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. I am unable to accept the contention of the learned advocate for the respondent that just because the Revenue has not filed similar applications in other cases, this application should be rejected. No doubt an appeal lies against the order ....