2015 (5) TMI 701

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....u, Adv. and Mr B Krishna Prasad, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr V Lakshmikumaran, Adv., Mr M P Devanath, Adv., Mr Vivek Sharma, Adv., Ms L Charanaya, Adv., Mr Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr R Ramachandran, Adv., Mr Anandh K, Adv., Mr Hemant Bajaj, Adv. and Mr Ambarish Pandey, Adv. ORDER The respondent herein is engaged in manufacturing of Ayurvedic PP Medicines, falling under sub heading No.3003.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A of Central Excise Act. Aggrieved the respondent approached CESTAT. The CESTAT vide order dated 14.2.2005 has allowed the appeal by relying upon the facts that the packing materials bears the words "not for medicinal use". The Revenue is in appeal challenging the judgment of the Tribunal. We may mention at the outset that the products which are involved are livfit premix, Ayucal Premix and Cald....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d animal feed supplement. Insofar as Ayucal premix is concerned, here again, CRCL has opined that it should be animal feed supplement. Thus, insofar as these two products are concerned, Government's own laboratory has classified them as animal feed supplement and not veterinary medicament. Insofar as Caldhan suspension is concerned, the CRCL could not give any opinion either way. Because of t....