Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (3) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocate For the Respondent : Shri T. N. Betgiri, JCIT ORDER V. Durga Rao (Judicial Member).- The present miscellaneous applications have been filed by the assessee under section 254(2) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (" the Act" for short) stating that while deciding the appeal vide order dated October 30, 2012 the Tribunal failed to consider certain issues. 2. The main argument of learned counse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....which has been extracted in the order, came to the conclusion that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has correctly decided the issue including the alternative ground raised by the assessee, and dismissed the appeal. The issue on the merits was squarely covered by the decision of the hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. Idea Cellular Ltd. [2010] 325 ITR 148 (Delhi). In our opin....