Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (5) TMI 318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Shah) 1.0 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Ahmedabad in X-Objection No.148/Ahd/2011 for the Assessment Year 2006-07, the Revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal with the following proposed substantial question of law. "Whe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see had not justified as to how the debts had become bad. That the AO having not satisfied with the explanation given by the assessee the AO added Rs. 1,58,529/- back to the income of the assessee. That on an appeal by the assessee, the learned CIT(A) confirmed the addition made by the AO holding that the amount of Rs. 1,58,529/- representing the advance given to different parties was not arising ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvances and other debit balances claimed by the assessee under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, the Revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeal with the aforesaid proposed substantial question of law. 3.0 Mrs. Bhatt, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has vehemently submitted that the learned Tribunal has materially erred in not appreciating the fact that the amount of Rs. 1,58,5....