Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (5) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amus and / or a writ in the nature of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in demanding the outstanding amount of sales tax due to M/s. Lumino Lamps Ltd., which has been taken over by the petitioner way back in the year 1994 through BIFR after a period of about 15 years as bad, illegal, unjust and improper and against the provisions of law; (C) be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and / or a writ in the nature of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, restraining the respondents from demanding and recovering the outstanding dues of M/s. Lumino Lamps Ltd. of the years CY 1986, CY 1987, 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-01 and 1991-92 from the petitioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efit of the Amnesty Scheme. It is submitted that however, solely on the ground that the total demand is more than Rs. 1 Crore, its application has been rejected. It is vehemently submitted by Shri Trivedi, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner that as such the respondent-appropriate authority has not even bifurcated the tax component, interest and penalty and the total of the demand, which is more than Rs. 1 Crore is including the tax component, interest and penalty. It is submitted that therefore, as such, the tax component would be less than Rs. 1 Crore. It is submitted that the action of the respondent even in not considering or rejecting the application of the petitioner to avail the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme, which....