2015 (4) TMI 740

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to argue the facts of the case elaborately. However, this Court posed a preliminary question to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to how the writ petitions are maintainable. 3. Such query was posed to the learned counsel for the petitioner due to the following facts. (i) The petitioner earlier approached this Court by way of filing W.P.Nos.10491 to 10494 of 2014, challenging the very same impugned orders of assessment dated 03.05.2013. The matter was heard by a learned Single Judge and after hearing the learned Additional Government Pleader, the learned Single Judge passed an interim order dated 10.04.2014 to the following effect: There shall be an order of interim stay on condition that the petitioner pays 25% of the tax amount,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cting the appellant to pay 25% of the tax amount, which had been claimed in the order dated 03.05.2013 impugned in the Writ Petitions. The appellant was directed to make payment of the tax amount, on or before 08.05.2014. The condition imposed by the learned single Judge to make 25% of the tax amount does not appear to be unreasonable and it is inconsonance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. 3. In these circumstances, we do not find any error in the order passed by the learned single Judge. Hence, the Writ Appeals stand dismissed. However, as prayed for by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, we grant a further period of two weeks enabling the appellant to make the payment, as directed by the learned Sin....