2015 (3) TMI 831
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No: 101/BPS/MUM/2013 dated 28/03/2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals-IV), Mumbai-I wherein the first appellate authority has set aside the order-in-original and allowed refund to the respondent herein. Aggrieved by such order, the Revenue is in appeal. 2. Despite notice, none appears on behalf of the respondent. Afte....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rn Union Finance Services, USA as per the schedule in the agreement. The respondent filed refund claim on 15/07/2009 along with various documents in support of the claim that there was no ground to pay service tax as the service rendered by them would fall under the category of 'Export of Service' and the service tax paid by them was under protest. The adjudicating authority rejected the refun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....resentative for more than one reason. 6. The issue is squarely covered by the majority decision of the Tribunal in the case of Paul Merchants Ltd. decision wherein an identical issue involving the very same principal, M/s. Western Union Money Network Ltd. for money transfer to persons located in one country to another person located in another country was considered. In the impugned order, the ra....