2015 (2) TMI 1006

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri Alok Srivastava, Dy.Commissioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: H.K. Thakur 1. These appeals have been filed by the Revenue against OIO No.15-16/Commr/2006, dt.10.02.2006/15.02.2006 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad-II by dropping the show cause notice. Grounds taken by the Revenue mainly are that adjudicating authority has only commented on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. It was the case of the ld.Advocate that appeals filed by the Revenue are not maintainable as the competent committee of Chief Commissioners signing the authorization is not committee constituted by the Central Government under Notification No.24/2005-CE(NT), dt.13.05.2005. Ld.Advocate also argued the case on merits relying upon various case laws to support the view already taken by the adjudica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ahmedabad and Chief Commissioner of Customs Ahmedabad to review the orders passed by CCE Ahmedabad-I, II, III, Bhavnagar & Rajkot Commissionerates. It is also observed that the present Review Order No.R-02/2008, dt.08.01.2007 has been signed by Chief Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad and Chief Commissioner of Central Excise Vadodara. As per the constitution of committees under Notification....