2015 (2) TMI 1006
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lok Srivastava, Dy.Commissioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: H.K. Thakur 1. These appeals have been filed by the Revenue against OIO No.15-16/Commr/2006, dt.10.02.2006/15.02.2006 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad-II by dropping the show cause notice. Grounds taken by the Revenue mainly are that adjudicating authority has only commented on the aspect of what ought to have been done by t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....als filed by the Revenue are not maintainable as the competent committee of Chief Commissioners signing the authorization is not committee constituted by the Central Government under Notification No.24/2005-CE(NT), dt.13.05.2005. Ld.Advocate also argued the case on merits relying upon various case laws to support the view already taken by the adjudicating authority. 4. Heard both sides and peruse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dabad to review the orders passed by CCE Ahmedabad-I, II, III, Bhavnagar & Rajkot Commissionerates. It is also observed that the present Review Order No.R-02/2008, dt.08.01.2007 has been signed by Chief Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad and Chief Commissioner of Central Excise Vadodara. As per the constitution of committees under Notification No.24/2005-CE(NT) Chief Commissioner of Central ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI