Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (2) TMI 963

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....acts of the case are that appellants are manufacturing aerated water classifiable under Chapter 22 of the CETA'85. The adjudicating authority demanded duty on breakages of bottles while handling. He has confirmed the demand of Rs. 11,82,246/- and also imposed equivalent penalty and demanded interest. Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected their appeal vide impugned order. 2. Ld. Advocate submits....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Enterprises Ltd. Vs CCE Meerut - 2008 (221) ELT 329 (All.) (ii) Virat Crane Agri-Tech Ltd. Vs CC & CE Guntur - 2011 (271) ELT 510 (A.P) 4. Heard both sides. I find that the appellants are manufacturer of aerated waters as seen from para-14 of the OIO, it is stated that percentage of breakages was 0.45% which is well below the limit of 0.5% prescribed by the Board's circular dt. 8.9.1971 and....