Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 921

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent : Shri  Ranjana Jha, AR  JUDGEMENT Per Ashok Jindal : Appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein mandatory penalty under section 11AC of the Act has been confirmed against them. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 18.3.2010, the investigation was conducted at the factory  of the appellant and shortage of inputs was found. The appellant explained the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g was conducted in their factory on 10.4.2009, a show cause notice was issued by invoking extended period of limitation and the said case was adjudicated and duty  demand was paid by them.  Therefore, subsequent show cause notice cannot be issued by  invoking extended period of limitation, therefore, penalty on the appellant is not imposable.  He further submits that Revenue ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p; Moreover, in this case, the appellant has admitted the shortage of inputs and clearance thereof without payment of duty, therefore extended period of limitation has been rightly invoked by the lower authorities.     She further submits that in this case  the appellant has paid only duty and not the interest before issuance of show cause notice.  Therefore, penalty ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....old that extended period of limitation is rightly invoked. 7. Further I find that when there  is an admission of removal of inputs without payment of duty and that fact came in the knowledge of Revenue during the course of investigation.  Therefore, the extended period of limitation is rightly invoked.  Further, I find that appellant has paid only duty and not interest, hence as pe....