Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 877

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent (AR) ORDER Per: B S V Murthy: The appellant is engaged in manufacture of innerwear, leisure wear, sportswear, thermal wear and socks for men and women. After hearing both sides for some, we decided to deal with the appeal. Accordingly, the requirement of predeposit is waived and appeal is taken up for final decision. 2. The details of disputes, submissions, counter submissions and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l submitted that in these cases also, the only lapse was that invoices were addressed to head office. She submits that now the appellants have documents to show receipt of inputs at the job workers premises, receipt of finished goods at their Bommsandra unit and clearance on payment of duty. She submits that all these documents were available but have been seized by the Department. However, she su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... otherwise and not accounted for properly. However the very same table has been reproduced by the Commissioner and he has observed "I find that only in the following cases, the allegation is that the goods are not received by M/s. PIL and inasmuch as there is no evidence to indicate that the goods have been received by the assessees". It is surprising that out of demand for more than Rs. 2.53 cror....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he ground that appellants have taken the credit on basic customs duty also in respect of inputs received from 100% EOU. The learned counsel submits that appellants have already reversed the amount disallowed which according to them has been wrongly taken. She submits that Rs. 9,33,163/- should not have been disallowed and credit has been taken correctly. This also can be verified when the matter i....