2015 (1) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... None, for the Respondent. ORDER Revenue is in appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. AT/450/M-III/2005, dated 29-8-2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II. 2. The respondent herein is M/s. GKW Pvt. Ltd., LBS Marg, Bhandup. They received duty paid on Steel Wire and Brass Wire during the period Sept., 2003 to June, 2004 and utilized the same in the manuf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ence of the said duty, he is entitled for the credit of the same under the Cenvat Credit Rules and, therefore, the excise authority having the jurisdiction over the recipient of inputs cannot reopen the classification adopted by the officer having jurisdiction over the input supplier as held by the Tribunal in the case of Kerala State Electronic Corpn. - 1996 (84) E.L.T. 44 (Tri.), Trinetra Textur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lar No. 720/36/2003-CX, dated 29-5-2003 issued by the CBE&C clarifying that drawing of wire from wire rods would not amount to manufacture. Accordingly, he pleads that the impugned order be set aside and the appeal allowed. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the Revenue. 5.1 It is true that in the case of Technoweld Industries (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court....