2013 (5) TMI 771

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the respondent. JUDGMENT This appeal under Section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003 (for short 'the Act') is against the order dated 21.12.2009 passed by the Value Added Tax Tribunal, Haryana, Chandigarh (for short 'the Tribunal'). We find that the following substantial questions of law arises for consideration:- (i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aggrieved against the said order, the appellant filed an appeal before the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (A) Ambala, which was dismissed vide order dated 03.06.2009 (A-2). It was held that the Nigam was controlled by the Government but still it did not make them Government Department to issue form C-3. During the proceedings, the appellant submitted one D-1 declaration form, which was iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Court in Deepak Radios Pvt. Ltd. v. The Union Territory of Chandigarh and another (VATAP No.56 of 2008 decided on March 18,2009) has an occasion to consider the prayer made by an assessee-dealer where he could not produce the requisite Forms 'C' and 'D' at the time of assessment. Following the law laid down by this Court in Prestolite of India Limited v. State of Haryana[1988] 70 ....