Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (1) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondents : Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate-General, Haryana, The judgment of the court was delivered by AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J.-The assessee-petitioner by way of present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India has sought quashing of the order dated February 6, 1995, annexure P6, passed by the Haryana Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana. 2. Briefly the facts as narrated in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o examine the legality and validity of the assessment order. The revisional authority took up the issue that the assessing authority while levying tax on purchases had left out purchase of machinery in the form of lease rent amounting to Rs. 19,17,824. Besides the rebate of tax worth Rs. 30,556 on corrugated boxes had been erroneously allowed. The revisional authority also held that the petitioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Act has been quashed. Hence this petition. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had filed Civil Writ Petition No. 6691 of 1993 (Sandan Vikas (India) Limited v. State of Haryana [2013] 59 VST 160 (P&H)) challenging the validity of section 2(gg) and 2(j) read with note 4 of the Act as amended whereby lease money was sought to be taxed as part of turnover ....