2012 (10) TMI 957

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: Bharat Ji Agrawal, Senior Counsel assisted by Rahul Srivastava DR. SATISH CHANDRA J.-The present revision under section 11(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 has been preferred against the judgment and order dated August 23, 2003 passed by the U.P. Commercial Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, in Appeal No. 36 of 2003. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee established a new unit and made the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tax equal to 150 per cent of the additional fixed capital investment of ₹ 1,34,37,160, i.e., up to ₹ 2,01,55,740 was granted to the assessee between the period February 27, 1998 to September 23, 2005, whichever is earlier. Later, the assessee, made a review application stating that its unit is covered both under the expansion as also the diversification scheme and, as such, under the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iew application was rejected by the competent authority by mentioning that the assessee has not provided the break-up of the fixed capital investment on the individual heads of expansion and diversification but the Tribunal vide its order observed that in the present case, there is already a provision for self-bifurcation of capital investment. On the record of the Divisional Level Committee/Chief....