2014 (12) TMI 614
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....GEMENT PER: R.K. Singh The appellant filed appeal against Order-in-appeal No. 215/RDN/ST/JPR-II/2012 dated 27.12.2012 which partially upheld the Order-in-Original No. 888/ST/2009-10 dated 24.09.2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner Central Excise Indore in as much as it upheld the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 61,847/- as against Rs. 69,360/- confirmed vide the said order-in-Original. 2. Briefl....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pair contract and so the service rendered there-under was not taxable under Finance Act, 1994. Thereafter, the appellant contended, they became eligible for small scale exemption under Notification 6/2005-ST with effect from 16.06.2005. Further the difference between the figures shown in the ledger and in the ST-3 returns occurred because in the ledger the figures were shown on accrual basis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bility of Rs. 5,51,324/- it paid Rs. 4,81,964/- only. So, I pass the following order after giving benefit of Notification No. 6/2005-ST dated 1.3.2005. Since interpretation of law is involved so I opt section 80 of Finance Act, 1994 and pass the order accordingly. 6. As may be observed, the adjudicating authority has clearly stated that there was interpretation of law involved and he ....