AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (11) TMI 879
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Appellant. Shri R.S. Srova, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant has six manufacturing units and have obtained registration as input service distributor for their head office and distributed service tax credit availed by them on various services in head office to six manufacturing units. In respect of unit at Mehsana, service tax credit of Rs. 7,67,66,000/- was held to b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lso relies on the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of CCE v. Jindal Photo Ltd. - 2009 (14) S.T.R. 812 (Tri.-Ahmd.) = 2009 (240) E.L.T. 728 (T), in the case of Philips Electronics (I) Ltd. v. CCE, Vadodara-I - 2009 (14) S.T.R. 209 (Tri-Ahmd.) = 2009 (237) E.L.T. 596 (T), in support of his contention that the defects in the invoices are procedural and rectifiable. He also submits that in the ca....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....edit distribution by the appellant, and also in view of the voluminous documents and details required, the omission happened. We also find that if the input service tax credit taken was wrong, action has to be taken at Pune. Therefore, as held in case of Philips Electronics, these defects which are essentially laid down to ensure that the details of input service is available with the person who i....