Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (11) TMI 670

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....GSC, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The assessee seeks admission of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal on the following question of law :- "1.    Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was correct in directing the appellant to pre-deposit Rs. 40 lakhs for hearing the appeal and to stay the operation of the impugned order? 2.      Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was justifi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Department denied Cenvat credit on M.S. Angles, M.S. Channels, M.S. Plates, TMT Rods etc. to the tune of Rs. 1,72,75,850/-. Apart from demanding interest and penalty to the tune of Rs. 15,80,000/- for the period from June, 2007 to November, 2009, the reason assigned by the Department was that these materials were used by the appellant only in the building of supporting structures/foundations for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... products only for building supporting structures. 6. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal considered the rival contentions pointed out that in the Final Order No. 40179/2013, dated  8-5-2013, the items in the subject matter were Additional Electrostatic Precipitator on raw mill project, Additional Fly Ash Handling System, MMD Crusher, etc., and the case on hand appear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed. 7. Mr. C. Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the Tribunal was not correct in directing the appellant to pre-deposit the amount for hearing the appeal and the observation of the Tribunal that the appellant has failed to make out a prima facie case was an incorrect finding. He further submitted that the Tribunal has failed to take into consideration the o....