2014 (11) TMI 370

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kesh Goyal, Addl. Commr. (AR) For the Respondent : Shri A.V. Naik, Adv. JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) decided the issue in favour of the respondent on account of valuation. 2. The brief facts of the case are that respondents are manufacture of machinery for pharmaceutical industry. The respondents ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from the said order, the Revenue is before us. 3. None appeared on behalf of the respondents. A request has been received for adjournment on the ground that the respondents have not received copy of the appeal filed by Commissioner. Therefore a copy of appeals may kindly be supplied and matter be adjourned. 4. After hearing the Ld. A.R. we are of the opinion that the appeal itself can be dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e respondent that they have recovered the transportation charges over and above actually paid by them. It is the contention of the respondent that goods have been sold at their factory gate and whatever the transportation charges paid by them on behalf of the buyers have been charged through debit note. In these circumstances, we do agree with the observation made by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)....