1983 (9) TMI 285

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri K. Sarvanai, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri A.S. Sundar Rajan, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Since these two appeals arise out of a common Order-in-Appeal and they involve a common point at issue and also relate to the same appellants, this combined order is being issued in respect of both of them. 2. The facts, in brief, are that the appellants entered into two contract....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....partment assessed the first-mentioned quantity of 60 M.T. also at the Higher London Metal Bulletin price. The Assistant Collector and the Appellate Collector maintained the decision of the Department. The appellants then field revision application to the Central Government which, on transfer to this Tribunal under Section 131B of the Customs Act, 1962, have been taken up as the subject appeals. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts maintained that in view of the market conditions and the international trade practice, the Department was not justified in rejecting the lower contracted price of U.S. $129.50 for the smaller consignment of 60 M.T. 4. The Department's representative reiterated the reasoning of the lower authorities that for the same goods contracted on the same date with the same supplier, there could ....