TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (10) TMI 414
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondent. ORDER Demand of Rs. 18,90,324/- has been confirmed on the ground that they have utilized Cenvat credit to the extent of more than 20% of the tax payable in contravention of Rule 6(3)(C) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The basis for this conclusion is that the appellant was providing services in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). The lower adjudicating authority has taken a view that t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s fact has been taken note of and accepted by the original adjudicating authority in Paragraph 18 of his order. 3. I find that in these circumstances, the demand of Rs. 18,90,324 is not sustainable and accordingly, the same is set aside. 4. Second demand is Rs. 11,80,160/- which has arisen because the Cenvat credit taken of service tax paid on commission paid to agencies by the appella....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be the result of composite contract. In such circumstances, the stand taken by the original adjudicating authority that the credit paid on sales commission is not admissible has to be upheld. However, at this stage learned C.A. submits that even the credit which was not taken by the appellant at all has also been included for the purpose of demand. He is not able to quantify the exact amount. Ther....