2014 (9) TMI 281
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent. ORDER P.C. : Since Mr. Suresh Kumar appearing on behalf of the Revenue has stated that the lapse is on his part in not complying with and removing the office objection has resulted in dismissal of the appeal, that we proceed to condone the delay. The delay is condoned as the cause shown is satisfactory and also because the litigant need not suffer on account of any lapse on the part....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI