2014 (8) TMI 844
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....yani and Ms Gauri For the Respondent : Ms S I Shah JUDGEMENT :- 1. Heard Mr Jagtiani, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. We have perused the petitions and all annexures thereto. The Petitioners are challenging what is termed as a Standing Order No.7493/99 dated 3rd December 1999 and Public Notice No.15/2009 dated 31st March 2009. 2. It is the submission of the learned....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e goods had been reassessed by the Respondent No.1 in terms of the provisions of the said standing Order. The Petitioner claims that the Respondent No.1 did not adhere to or follow the mandate of the Customs Act and the Rules. 4. Before us, an attempt has been made to show as to how the purported stand of the Respondent No.1 is contrary to the legal provisions noticed above. Reliance is placed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he judgment of thew Hon'ble Supreme Court inasmuch as the Respondent No.1 cannot ignore the transaction value in the invoices and refer to the rates published in the PLATT magazine. Therefore, the PLATT magazine rates would be applied ignoring the transaction rate is the premise on which the Petitioner has approached this Court. 7. We are afraid that we cannot entertain these Petitions on t....
TaxTMI