Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (8) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JUDGMENT (Delivered by R. Sudhakar,J.) The appellant, who is an importer, has filed this appeal aggrieved against the Final Order No.670 of 2006, dated 31.7.2006, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for brevity, the Tribunal ) and the same was admitted on the following substantial questions of law: "1. In the facts and circumstance where the goods were purcha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as under: The appellant imported Stainless Steel Coil AISI 304 from Belgium and filed a Bill of Entry dated 31.1.2002 claiming exemption from payment of duty under DEEC (Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate) Scheme. On examination of the goods by the experts from the National Metallurgical Laboratory, Chennai, it was stated that the goods, though apparently are of second quality, still conform ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ner of Customs, the importer filed Bill of Entry for home consumption and obtained clearance of the goods against payment of duty, redemption fine and penalty. However, the importer appealed to the Tribunal challenging the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs. 2.3. The Tribunal was of the view that there is implicit admission by the importer that for the purpose of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... raised is with regard to the quanta of redemption fine and penalty. 4. We find from the order of the Tribunal that the Tribunal has, in fact, been lenient in reducing the redemption fine from Rs. 2,50,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000/- and penalty from Rs. 30,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- in a case of proven mis-declaration of goods with an intention to avail the benefit conferred under DEEC Scheme, which, in our....