TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (8) TMI 627
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fore, with the consent of both sides, appeal as well as stay application are taken up for final disposal. 3. The facts in brief are that : a) The demand of service tax under the category of Commercial and Industrial Construction service, of Rs. 1,48,74,141/- was confirmed on account of material supplied by the customers during the period October 2007 to March 2012. b) A demand of service tax of Rs. 9,90,50,094/- under the category of Works Contract Service have been confirmed on the value of materials supplied by the customers. c) A demand of service tax of Rs. 8,27,82,947/- under the category of Commercial and Industrial Construction service, Rs. 8,87,77,498/- under the category ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....7.07.2009 and it will not be apply for the contracts commenced prior to 07.07.2009. Therefore, out of 10 contracts, for which demand has been confirmed, three contracts were commenced prior to 07.07.2009. For the remaining contracts, it is submitted that once the service tax is paid under the composition scheme, value of materials supplied by the service recipient needs to be included and that works out Rs. 1,29,71,747/-, against which the appellant has already paid a sum of Rs. 1.7 crores. Therefore, same may be considered to meet out the said demand. 4.2 He further submits that for the demand based on the Profit & Loss Account, figures during the period October 2007 to March 2012, its submitted that the classification of these services h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cument/agreement before the Adjudicating Authority for examination. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority has passed the order on merits and need not be remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority. 6. Considered the submissions. 7. In this case, a demand of Rs. 1,48,74,141/- has been confirmed on the value of materials supplied by the customers. The issue came up before the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd. (supra) wherein it was held that value of gods and material supplied free of cost by the service recipient to the provider of taxable construction service, being neither monitory or non-monitory construction paid by or flowing from the service recipient, occurring to the benefit of service provider, would be out....