1981 (9) TMI 287
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed in the revision application, those urged during the course of personal hearing and have examined the records of the case. 2. Shri N. Mookherjee, who appeared on behalf of the Applicants stated that the issue involved in this case was similar to the one which the applicants had agitated in a writ petition filed before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. On their writ petition in that case ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ly, Government proceed to decide the present case on its merits. 4. The question before the Government is whether aluminium wire rods manufactured from wire bars should be treated as an excisable item under Tariff Item 27(a) (ii) of Central Excise Tariff as those rods were produced in course of manufacture of electric wires and cables falling under Tariff Item 33-B of Central Excise Tariff. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....etary in respect of Revision Application dated 10-10-1975 of M/s. The Indian Cable Co. Ltd. against Order-in-Appeal No. 122 to 125/BR and 184/CO of 1975 dated 30-5-1975 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta. ORDER Government of India have considered the points raised in the revision application, those urged during the course of personal hearing and have examined the recor....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI