TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1982 (5) TMI 180
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n appeal filed by Howrah Enterprises, Howrah against order (original) No. 206 (19) 80-Collr 36/81 dated 8-4-1981 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta - (a) demanding duty on cotton fabrics (processed cotton beltings) exceeding 15 CMS in width valued ₹ 8,90,402.88 removed during the period from 31-3-1977 to 7-8-1980 without observing Central Excise formalities and without....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....were not furnished because the allegations in the Show Cause Notice (SCN) were that they had removed cotton beltings misdeclaring them as processed 'hair beltings'. 5. There were 20 allegations in regard to the goods cleared by them as cotton beltings. 6. At the time of hearing on 3-3-1981 they were only asked to separate the figures of 'beltings' with more than 15 CMS width up to 15 C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... past. 11. In the circumstances, the Advocate pleaded that the demand for duty was based on wrong premises and there was no ground for imposition of penalty on them. 12. The Board has carefully considered the facts of the case and the submissions written and oral, made by the appellants. 13. The Board observes that the appellants had in fact furnished the figures of the clearance....