Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1980 (1) TMI 194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. V/15A/IS/96/77, dated 21-2-78 of Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore II Division wherein he has imposed a penalty of ₹ 700/- on the appellant under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. I have carefully gone through the records of the case considered the appeal as also the points urged at the time of personal hearing. 3. The appeal, in substance, is t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... They stick to it in the present proceedings before me also. 4. I find that the total difference in duty between the quantum payable and that actually paid was paid by the appellants once the mistake to which the short payment was attributable was noticed. This apart, the difference itself is a paltry sum. When viewed against this background, the offence committed by them turns out to be a ....