2014 (7) TMI 369
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esentative (Jt. CDR) For the Respondent : Shri A.P. Mathur, Advocate JUDGEMENT Per. Rakesh Kumar :- The facts leading to filing of this appeal by the Revenue and Cross Objection filed by the respondent are, in brief, as under. 1.1 The respondent are registered with Service Tax Department for providing the services under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service and Business Aux....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Rs. 1,000/- on them under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 and penalty of Rs. 1,00,111/- under Section 78 ibid. On appeal being filed to Commissioner (Appeals) against this order of the Assistant Commissioner, the Commissioner (Appeals) vide order-in-appeal dated 14/11/08 set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order and allowed the appeal. The demand in respect of repair and maintenance service....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e filed a Cross Objection in respect of the Revenue's appeal. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Mrs. Suchitra Sharma, the learned Jt. CDR, assailed the impugned order by reiterating the grounds of appeal in the Revenue's appeal and she emphasized that as is clear from the facts narrated by the order-in-original passed by the original Adjudicating Authority, the respondent had fabricated steel stor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....that the respondent have provided Business Auxiliary Service, we find that the activity which has been treated as Business Auxiliary Service, as described in the grounds of appeal, is fabrication of steel storage tanks, dozers, settlers, steel structures, platforms, railing, foundation frames etc. and their erection and installation in the factory. The Department's plea is that these steel items a....


TaxTMI