Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (6) TMI 818

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: P G Chacko: After examining the records and hearing both sides, we find that a classification dispute is involved in this case. The assessee classified their product viz. "Refined Palm Stearin" under heading 1511 90 while the Revenue classified it under heading 3823 11 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. The impugned demand of duty for the period September 2008 to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have had believed during the period of dispute that their product was classifiable under heading 1511 and, hence, they cleared the goods by claiming the benefit of the relevant exemption notification. It further appears from the submissions of both sides that this Bench, in two recent stay orders, granted waiver and stay in favour of similar manufacturers of 'refined palm stearin', having....