2014 (6) TMI 744
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... This is the revenue's appeal against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-XI Ahmedabad dated 30-11-2010 deleting the addition of Rs. 15,46,933/- being interest received for delay in payment of compensation for land acquisition. 2. The brief facts of the case are that return of income declaring total income of Rs. 85,650/- was filed and the same was processed u/s. 143(1). On verification of this return and t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....m in para 3.1 of his order deleted this addition by observing as under:- "3.2. The learned A.R's contentions in brief are as follow. The land belonging to 3 co-owners - appellant, his brother and mother (as evidenced by the copy of 7/12 Utara, enclosed to the Return of Income) -was acquired by Sardar Sarovr Nigam ltd. Therefore, the interest received is to be trifurcated among the three perso....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing considered the facts of the case and in the light of the caselaws relied upon, I m inclined to agree with the contentions of the A.R. A. O. is directed to apportion the impugned interest of Rs. 15,46,930/- among the 3 co-owners. The interest apportioned to the appellant shall be spread over the period of delay in paying the compensation. The share of interest accruing to the appellant for the ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI