Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (5) TMI 902

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filing of the appeal and vide order No. M/64/2013/CSTB/C-1, dated 10-1-2013, the COD application was allowed. That time, the learned Counsel for the appellants submitted that the issue involved has already been decided by the Tribunal in the appellant's own case and therefore, early hearing be allowed. Accordingly the case was listed for final hearing on 28-3-2013. The case could not be heard on the said date and the matter was adjourned for hearing today. In the meanwhile, the appellant has submitted a letter dated 2-5-2013 seeking to adjourn the hearing on the ground that the person dealing with the matter has left the organization and they are in the process of locating certain relevant documents. Therefore, the Counsel for the appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on No. 21/2002 and accordingly, he denied the benefit of the said exemption. Aggrieved by the said decision, the appellant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate authority, who also rejected the appeal on the ground that the EPC contract entered into between the appellant and GICL is not the contract referred to in condition No. 40 and, therefore, the appellant did not fulfil the eligibility criteria stipulated in the notification. Hence, the appellant is before us. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the applicant's own case in respect of an identical matter pertaining to another contract awarded by NHAI to M/s. Gorakhpur Infrastructure Co. Ltd., this Tribunal had considered the issue at length. In that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Transport, or (ii)     a person who has been awarded a contract for the construction of roads in India by or on behalf of the Ministry of Surface Transport, by the National Highway Authority of India, by the Public Works Department of a State Government or by a road construction corporation under the control of the Government of a State or Union Territory; or (iii)    a person who has been named as a sub-contractor in the contract referred to in (ii) above for the construction of roads in India by or on behalf of the Ministry of Surface Transport, by the National Highway Authority of India, by Public Works Department of a State Government or by a road construction corporation under the control of th....