2014 (5) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e For the Respondent : Mr. K L Goyal, Comm.(AR) PER : Shri P.R. Chandrasekharan, Member (Technical) 1. The miscellaneous applications have been filed seeking modification of the stay order No. S/351 - 352/WZB/2011/CSTB dated 19.08.2011 passed by this Tribunal wherein the appellants, M/s. Grey Worldwide (I) Pvt. Ltd., were directed to make a pre - deposit of Rs. 85 lakhs within a period of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wed by this Tribunal itself in the case of Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd., in stay order No. M/436/11/CSTB/C - I dated 20.10.2011 and stay was granted from recovery of dues adjudged during the pendency of the appeal. 3. The Ld. Counsel also relies on the decision of the Hon‟ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Amar Food Products vs. UOI, reported in 2010 (259) ELT 0490 - Guj, where in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f allowed, would amount to review the order passed earlier. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. 5.1. It is a settled decision in law that the Tribunal has no power to review its own order, however, modification of the order can be asked in the event of "change in circumstances" as held in Baron International Ltd. case cited supra relied upon by the Revenue....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Amar Food Products cited supra has held that even a reference to a Larger Bench on a question of law would amount to "change in circumstance". If that be so, a decision interpreting the law would certainly amount to change in circumstance, if such interpretation came about after passing of the impugned order. Thus, in our view there is a change in circumsta....