Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (5) TMI 205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JUDGEMENT Per: D M Misra: 1. These two Applications are filed seeking waiver of pre-deposit of an amount of Rs.15.15 Crores and Rs.21.37 Crore, respectively. 2. Miss Reema Khair, Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that during the relevant period 1998-2001, the Applicant had imported HSD and paid appropriate duty on the value arrived at, by taking into consideration the Administered Price ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deposited to the oil pool account, section 28B of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be made applicable; she has referred to the decisions of this Tribunal in the case of Hindusthan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Cochin - G and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla - 2008 (227) ELT 263 (Tri.-Ahmd.) 3. Per contra Ld. Special Counsel Shri D.K. Acharyya for the Revenu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f 'Naptha' which was not covered under APM; she submits that while distinguishing its earlier judgement dated 22.04.2008 the Tribunal has recorded a categorical finding at para 5 of the said judgement. 5. Heard both sides and perused the record. Prima facie we find that the legal issue involved in the present case is covered by the decision of the Co-ordinated Bench in the cases of Hindus....