TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (5) TMI 111
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Motor Car. 3. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 6,345/- on Staff Welfare Expenses. 4. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 23,123/- on Loss on Sale of Motor Car. 5. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 8,400/- on Conveyance Expenses. 6. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 7,80,000/- on Premises User Expenses. 7. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 3,23,533/- on Interest on Overdraft & Unsecured Loans." 3. At the time of hearing, there is none to represent the assessee before us and however, it is seen from the file that the ass....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....connection with the welfare of the staff on day-to-day basis. No evidence was furnished by the assessee to substantiate his claim. Therefore, AO rejected the self-serving vouchers filed before him and made disallowance as above. Similar is the case of Conveyance Expenses and the assessee allegedly failed to evidence the claims. However, this is the claim of the assessee that the said expenditure was incurred for the local transport of the employees. Considering the incurring of expenditure in cash, the AO made the disallowances applying the ad-hoc disallowance @ 20% of the amounts debited to the P & L Account on these four accounts. CIT (A) confirmed the same and the contents of para 2 of his order are relevant in this regard. Before us, in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ccordingly, AO disallowed an amount of Rs. 23,123/- on account of loss on sale of motor car. Matter carried in appeal before the first appellate authority, where in the CIT (A) dismissed the said ground as the same was not pressed by the assessee. 7. During the proceedings before us it is the submission of the assessee that the Motor Car was used for the business purposes of the assessee and therefore, the loss incurred on its sale is a loss of business and the same should not be termed as capital loss. 8. On the other hand Ld DR relied on the order of the AO and mentioned that the said Motor Car is a part of block of asset on which depreciation has been claimed in the earlier years. Being its depreciable nature of the asset, the same con....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fore the first appellate authority, after considering the submissions of the assessee, CIT (A) dismissed the appeal by stating that the assessee was failed to discharge the onus regarding the claim of Rs. 7,80,000/- as the same is being spent wholly and fully for business purposes. Aggrieved, assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal by raising above mentioned ground no.6 12. During the proceedings before us, assessee made written submissions in this regard and referred to some annexures, which were not examined by the AO at the relevant point of time. As per assessee, the said annexures constitute relevant details and information regarding the impugned payment of Rs. 7,80,000/-. 13. On the other hand, Ld DR dutifully relied on the orders....