2014 (4) TMI 795

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aring both sides, we find that the issue agitated before us is whether, for the period of dispute (between April 2007 and March 2011), CENVAT credit on outdoor catering service was admissible to the appellant. The appellant is a manufacturer of excisable goods and had employed more than 250 workers during the said period. They used outdoor catering service for supply of subsidised food to their em....