TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2008 (11) TMI 640
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....st the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Branch), Chennai, dated November 12, 1996 in T.A. No. 713 of 1995 for the assessment year 1992-93. The assessee is the petitioner herein. The relevant assessment year is 1992-93. The assessee is a dealer in bearings. Serval defects were found in the inspection conducted on August 17, 1992. It was found that the goods received from their other....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....here was no justification in arriving at the conclusion that there was purchase suppression. The basis on which addition was made was also challenged as unwarranted and as also the levy of penalty. The appellate authority found from the records that the assessee had not maintained its accounts in the ordinary course of business and hence their returns could not be relied as true and correct. They....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t Pleader submitted that the goods relating to suppression is factual and there is no error in the factual findings recorded and there is no justification to interfere. The inspection was conducted on August 17, 1992. The defects relating to variation of stock and also purchase suppression relating to transport of goods from Chennai to Secundrabad branch and vice versa. The unaccounted receipt of....