Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (12) TMI 946

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Breakers, Duolite C-20, Control Panel, Steam Air Heater, Laboratory Mixing Oil, Internal Design drive etc. under erstwhile Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. A SCN dated 1-9-1995 was issued to the appellants proposing to deny the credit on the ground that the said items were not capital goods. The appellants debited an amount of Rs. 27,783/- vide RG23A Part-II on 17-5-1996 and an amount of Rs. 1,58,318/- on 31-1-1997 vide RG23A Part-II under protest. The entire demand raised vide the aforesaid SCN dated 1-9-1995 was confirmed vide Order No. BLS/125/1996, dated 23-8-1996. The appellants filed an appeal with the Commr. (Appeals), Surat who vide order No. SSS/S.R.T./1639-1648/99, dated 22-9-1999 partially allowed the appeal except for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tlal Industries Ltd. [1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.)] and Sahkari Udyog Mandal Ltd. & Ors. [2005 (181) E.L.T. 328 (S.C.)] and the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. BDH Industries Ltd. [2008 (229) E.L.T. 364 (T-LB)]. Relying on these decisions, lower authorities have held that assessee has failed to show that duty burden has not been passed on. I find that we are not really concerned with a refund claim of duty which was paid earlier, but claimed as refund subsequently in this case. Appellant had taken credit on capital goods and on objection raised by the Revenue, as a law abiding citizen, appellant reversed it without waiting for adjudication process, but challenged the same and ultimately succeeded at Tribunal ....