Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 833

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....                  JUDGEMENT No representation for the appellant despite notice, nor any request of theirs for adjournment. On the last occasion also, there was no representation for the party despite notice. On a perusal of the records, it is found that, in the case of Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd., vs. The Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st by the department, but no stay obtained from the Hon'ble High Court. Therefore, the ratio of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. (supra) is liable to be followed in the present case. 2. The learned Superintendent (A.R.) has referred to the decision of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner Vs. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandli Ltd. [2011 (263)E.L.T.34 (Guj.)....