2014 (4) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner is stated as aggrieved of the condition imposed by the fifth respondent vide Ext.P9 interim order passed on 10.03.2014, whereby the petitioner is required to satisfy 25% of the outstanding demand on or before 25.03.2014, so as to avail the benefit of interim stay during the pendency of the appeal concerned. 2. The sequence of events reveals that, Ext. P6 series of assessment orders were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by way of Ext.P7 series of appeals, along with I.As for stay. It was after considering the I.As for stay, that Ext.P9 order came to be passed without any regard to the actual facts and figures and the relevant provisions of law and hence the challenge. 3. Sri. K. Srikumar, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that, in respect of the previous assessment year, i.e., 2010-11, the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the matter stands remitted back to the assessing authority, to be reconsidered, virtually accepting the contention put forth by the petitioner. It is stated that, it is the very same officer who has passed Ext.P9 order on 10.03.2014, imposing a condition, which is rather an onerous one. The said order is stated as a mechanical one, in so far as the position of law declared by the binding judicial ....