2014 (4) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. 2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of the Kerala High Court in Crl. Appeal No.1104 of 2004, by which the High Court modified the sentence awarded by the trial Court to that of rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh, and in default, simple imprisonment for three more months for an offence committed under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act, 1077. 3. The prosec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the evidence against him. On the side of the accused, DW1 was examined. As already stated, the trial Court, after appreciating the oral and documentary evidence, convicted the appellant under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act, for the offence committed and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for two years and six months and a fine of Rs.1 lakh, and in default, further rigorous imprisonment for ....