Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 612

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. From the respondents' side, a counter-affidavit and two supplementary counter-affidavits have been filed. The petitioners are aggrieved by the act of the respondents trying to recover trade tax dues against the company known as Idol Commerce Private Limited, Kanpu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t lays down the law that recovery of trade tax dues is permissible from the personal assets of the directors of the company. After hearing the parties, we are of the opinion that it is not necessary to go into the issue whether the petitioners in fact resigned from directorship of the company as alleged by them and also into the question whether if the petitioners have resigned and not intimated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he directors. It is not a case of the Government or department that funds of the company have been fraudulently transferred or siphoned off by the petitioners in their capacity as directors. It is also not the case of the respondent-department that the petitioners were personal guarantors for the dues of the company. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that whether the petitioners have....